Gun Control Regulations and their Impact on Crime

Jones L. Webb Jr.

CJUS 230-D14

May 7, 2013

Professor Frances Gattis


This paper examines gun control laws and just how they influence crime rates. The paper runs on the number of solutions obtained from EBCOhost, EBL Patron, and Myilibrary databases. The resources used are books and journal articles. These solutions present study done around the topic. The paper is definitely divided into distinct sections. In the introduction section, control regulations are described. The next section dwells upon theories. Two theories are analyzed inside the paper. The next section is definitely titled earlier studies. This section looks at the body of research done on the theme. Under murder and committing suicide rates, the paper looks at trends in these two types of crime and just how they have been motivated or troubled by gun control laws. The next section dwells on gun control laws and regulations. In this section, the research looks at two essential control laws and regulations and evaluates their impact on crime rates. The paper also looks at self-defense and the success of obscured weapon laws in avoiding crime. Inside the discussion section, the daily news looks at other views supporting the hypothesis that weapon control regulations have no influence on crime rates.

Gun control laws refer to specific with legal requirements on the possession, sell, and transit of guns near your vicinity (Jacobs, 2002). They are regulations formulated to deal with issues of access and use of pistols. These laws establish a quantity of limitations about practices associated with guns near your vicinity. There are laws that bar the use of selected types of guns. This sort of laws make it illegal to be owning certain weapons. Other regulations target groups within the society and their access to or usage of guns. These kinds of laws allow access to or perhaps use of firearms by particular groups although denying the same to some teams. Federal laws, for example , forbid some categories of people coming from purchasing or maybe possessing guns. Those ineligible include illegal aliens, medication users, fugitives, and folks convicted of felony (Jacobs, 2002). A breach of the laws attracts defined charges. For instance, a person recently convicted of any felony and located in possession of that gun is material to a ten-year sentencing within a maximum penitentiary facility (Jacobs, 2002). Having gun control laws will not likely affect the criminal offenses rate here in the United States. Weapon control regulations will not limit criminals via purchasing guns and it will not really address the actual issues of crimes. The majority of local and local regulations on weapon control carefully mirror the federal laws. For instance, in numerous states, children are prohibited from accessing or perhaps using firearms. In these states, persons who have make it possible for kids to access firearms are deemed to have fully commited an offense. These kinds of laws vary in their mounting as well as the consequence they impose. Some claims have regulations similar to federal government laws although others possess stricter laws and regulations (Stell, 2004). In the United States, stricter gun control laws are usually more evidenced in Northern declares. On the other hand, The southern part of states possess less limitations and settings (Jacobs, 2002). In the history of the United States, diverse events make legislators on the federal and state levels to reconsider gun handles. Crime using guns has been an important factor inside the decision to examine gun settings. Incidents of shooting sprees have motivated calls for weapon control regulations to be amended to make firearm access harder (Jacobs, 2002). In recent times, capturing sprees in theaters and also other public areas in the country have made the debate to gain inspiration. In the wake of these situations, gun control proponents include suggested a reframing of gun laws to effect increased controls (Lott, 2013). On the other hand, competitors of weapon controls take care of the stance that gun control laws have no effect on perpetration of crime. As such, consider that firmer controls will not serve...

Bibliography: Doherty, N. (2009). Firearm control about trial: In the Supreme The courtroom battle over the Second Amendment. Washington, D. C: Cato Institute.

Goss, K. A. (2010). Disarmed: The Lacking Movement for Gun Control in America. Princeton: Princeton School Press.

Jacobs, J. W. (2002). May gun control work?. Oxford: Oxford College or university Press.

Koper, C. T., & Roth, J. A. (2002). The effect of the year 1994 Federal Invasion Weapons Suspend on Gun Markets: A great Assessment of Short-Term Main and Second Market Results. Journal Of Quantitative Criminology, 18(3), 239-266.

Lambert, M. T., & Silva, S. S. (1998). An Update around the Impact of Gun Control Legislation upon Suicide. Psychiatric Quarterly, 69(2), 127-134.

Lott, J. L. (2013). Even more Guns, Significantly less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Malcolm, J. (2003). Lessons of History: Guns Regulation and the Reduction of Crime. The state of texas Review Of Regulation & National politics, 8(1), 175-187.

Moorhouse, T. C., & Wanner, N. (2006). Does Gun Control Reduce Criminal offense or Will Crime Boost Gun Control?. CATO Diary, 26(1), 103-124.

Mundt, R. J. (1993). Rejoinder to comments in `Gun control and prices of guns violence in Canada and the Us '. Canadian Journal Of Criminology, 35(1), 42-48.

Spitzer, R. M. (2009). Weapon control: A documentary and reference guideline. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press.

Stell, M. K. (2004). The Production of Criminal Assault in America: Is Strict Gun Control the perfect solution is. Journal Of Law, Treatments & Values, 32(1), 38-46.

Webster, G. W., & Starnes, Meters. (2000). Reexamining the Connection Between Kid Access Reduction Gun Regulations and Unintentional Shooting Fatalities of Children. Pediatrics, 106(6), 1466.


Call in the Wild Article

Essay upon Lentil as Anything